Ruminations on the 2008 GOP Nomination

Just another WordPress.com weblog

A Goldwater sized defeat for Huckabee?

with one comment

Many of the posts and blogs that I have seen in the various conservative websites have many people expressing their concern that if Huckabee where to be nominated as the Republican candidate for the Presidency, that he would suffer such an epic defeat that he would be compared to Goldwater.  Yet nowhere have I seen an in depth analysis that leads to such a conclusion.

After taking a slightly closer look at the possibilities of a Huckabee nomination I have come to conclude that Huckabee will most certainly lose the Presidency to any of the Democratic candidates. However, it would not be of the magnitude of Goldwater’s loss back in 1964.

The first reason why his loss will not be so large is that the electorate is so polarized right now that Huckabee is virtually guaranteed to win more than the six states Goldwater won back in 1964.   Adding the enthusiastic support of the evangelicals to the currently polarized electorate and Huckabee (and any of the leading GOP candidates) would definitely win at least 20 states in November 2008.   Easily besting Goldwater’s performance.   However, in my opinion Huckabee’s prospects for a victory are almost non-existent.

The Democratic nominee can expect to win the following states without breaking too much of a sweat: California, Connecticut, Delaware, DC, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.   Each of these states was won by Kerry in 2004 by a margin of more than 7% points and can be considered reliably Democratic.  That’s 12 states and DC, which add up to 168 electoral votes.

Huckabee as the Republican nominee can expect to win the following states:  Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming. These states were won by Bush by a margin of more than 7% and can be considered reliably Republican especially given Huckabee’s evangelical support which is very influential in many of these states.   That’s 25 states, which add up to 213 electoral votes.

This breakdown appears to give Huckabee the advantage as we begin to look at the “swing states.”   I am defining the swing states as those states in the 2004 election that were won by a margin of less than 7%.   

These states include: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin for a total of 13 states.  

A few items to keep in mind while examining each of these states: 

§        Democrats are united in their desire to take back the presidency.  Given this premise, I think Huckabee’s appeal to the so-called Reagan Democrats will be limited.

§        Republicans are not.   There is plenty of evidence of Republicans who have said that they would rather vote for the Democratic candidate than vote for Huckabee.  This evidence has begun to be noticed by major pundits as discussion of “Obama Republicans” has just surfaced similar to the Reagan Democrats of the 80’s.  

§        Also, assuming that most independents would rather vote for the Democratic candidate than Huckabee (This assumption does need to be explored in more depth to be validated) as many of the bloggers and pundits believe based upon Huckabee’s currently weak numbers in New Hampshire compared to his stellar performance in Iowa.   Also, polls have shown that most Indpendents will be voting in the democratic primary rather than the republican primary.  

§        The combined loss of moderate republicans and independents will be a killer combination for Huckabee.

So using the assumptions above, I will walk briefly through the remaining 13 “swing states” and examine Huckabee’s potential for winning each of those states.    

  

COLORADO:   Bush won Colorado by 5% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows Colorado’s electorate as being made up of 30% Democrats, 35% Republicans, and 34% Independents.   Any defection of Republicans to the Democrats, as well as a Democratic victory in the independent vote could easily swing Colorado into the Democractic Column.      Democrat 177 Huckabee 213

FLORIDA:   Bush won Colorado by 5% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows Florida’s electorate as being made up of 41% Democrats, 37% Republicans, and 19% Independents.   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote, he would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote. Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 204 Huckabee 213

IOWA:   Bush won IOWA by less than 1% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows Iowa’s electorate as being made up of 31% Democrats, 30% Republicans, and 39% Independents. Any defection of Republicans to the Democrats, as well as a Democratic victory in the independent vote could easily swing Colorado into the Democractic Column.   Democrat 211 Huckabee 213

MICHIGAN:   Kerry won Colorado by 3% in 2004.   In fact, Democrats have won Michigan the last 4 Presidential elections.   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote, he would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote. Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 228 Huckabee 213

MINNESOTA:   Kerry won Minnesota by 3% in 2004.   In fact, Democrats have won Minnesota the last 5 Presidential elections.   Even Dukakis beat Bush here.   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote, He would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote. Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 238 Huckabee 213

NEVADA:   Bush won Nevada by 3% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows Nevada’s electorate as being made up of 40% Democrats, 39% Republicans, and 15% Independents. Any defection of Republicans to the Democrats, as well as a Democratic victory in the independent vote could easily swing Nevada into the Democratic Column.  Democrat 243 Huckabee 213

NEW HAMPSHIRE: Kerry won New Hampshire by just a little more than 1% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows New Hampshire’s electorate as being made up of 26% Democrats, 30% Republicans, and 44% Independents. Any defection of Republicans to the Democrats, as well as a Democratic victory in the independent vote would easily keep New Hampshire in the Democratic Column.  Democrat 247 Huckabee 213

NEW JERSEY: Kerry won New Jersey by almost 7% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows New Jersey’s electorate as being made up of 24% Democrats, 18% Republicans, and 48% Independents.  Huckabee could not afford a single defection and would have to overwhelmingly win the Independent vote.  Democrat 262 Huckabee 213

NEW MEXICO: Bush won New Mexico by less than 1% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political Dashboard shows New Mexico’s electorate as being made up of 49% Democrats, 33% Republicans, and 15% Independents. .   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote.   He would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote as well.   Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 267 Huckabee 213

OHIO: Bush won Ohio by a little more than 2% in 2004.   Bush won Ohio in 2004 and 2000.  Clinton won Ohio in 1992, 1996.   The analysis of the 2000 & 2004 elections showed that the “values voters’ were one of the major differentiators for Ohio.   Given Huckabee’s strong evangelical support, I can see Huckabee solidifying Ohio in the Republican column.   Democrat 267 Huckabee 233

OREGON: Kerry won Oregon by 4% in 2004.   Yahoo’s Election 08 Political Dashboard shows Oregon’s electorate as being made up of 39% Democrats, 35% Republicans, and 22% Independents. .   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote.   He would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote as well.   Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 274 Huckabee 233

PENNSYLVANIA: Kerry won Pennsylvania by almost 3% in 2004.  Yahoo’s Election 08 Political Dashboard shows Pennsylvania’s electorate as being made up of 48% Democrats, 40% Republicans, and 0% Independents.   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote.   He would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote as well.   Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 295 Huckabee 233

WISCONSIN: Kerry won Wisconsin by less than 1% in 2004.   In fact, Democrats have won Wisconsin the last 5 Presidential elections.   Even Dukakis beat Bush here.   Huckabee would not only have to avoid any Republican defections as well as win the Independent vote.   He would also have to win a good portion of the Democratic vote as well.   Given their ardent desire to win back the Presidency that is highly unlikely.   Democrat 305 Huckabee 233

So, although I do not foresee a Goldwater sized defeat for Huckabee should he represent the GOP in the November 2008 Presidential Election, his prospects for a successful run at the Presidency are very weak.   The loss of a large number of moderate Republicans as well as the loss of the Independent vote will doom his campaign.   He must find a way to capture these voters if he wishes to succeed.   However, his campaign style has served to alienate those voters by directly making use of his religion and taking positions that are not welcomed by the center.    

    

A final thought to keep in mind.   If Huckabee is successful at staving off mass defections from the Republican Party and is able to win the Independent vote in several key states, he actually might make the race close.   The race could swing on one state as it did in 2000. Utah has been reliably Republican for decades, but Yahoo’s Election 08 Political dashboard shows indpendents making up 53% of the electorate with 33% Republicans and less than 10% democrats.   Huckabee’s attack on Romney’s Mormonism and especially the vituperative attacks by many of his supporters on the Mormon faith just might be their undoing.   It is not inconceivable that the overwhelmingly Republican Mormons would utterly refuse to vote for Huckabee and either stay home or vote for the Democratic candidate swinging Utah into the Democratic column.   Seems impossible, but Huckabee is the one man who can do that.  How ironic it would be if he were to lose the election because of Utah.  

Advertisements

Written by hollywood66

January 7, 2008 at 4:14 pm

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. One thing you didn’t mention is Huckabee’s proposing, explaining and defending the Fair Tax reform program (the national retail sales tax that eliminates all income taxes, all payroll deductions, all corporate taxes, all taxes on savings etc., and best of all, eliminates the IRS).

    The Fair Tax has been around for 20+ years and has broad appeal across party lines. There are 20 million voters who understand and support the Fair Tax. It’s truly a “grass roots” movement and has substantial support among Libertarians, Independents and a suprising amount of support from Democrats.

    This grass roots movement can put Huckabee over the top and has the possibility of moving many of the “swing states” into the Huckabee column.

    The MSM and even the Republican talking heads and pundits are ignoring the fact that this is the ONLY “big idea” among any of the candidates of either party.

    With Huckabee’s eloquence and his understanding of the Fair Tax, it CAN be sold to the American people and they can force the Congress to pass the legislation. About 15% of the 535 members of Congress already support it and with a national spokesman like Huckabee, real true “change” can come to the tax system of this country.

    Almost everybody hates the IRS and when the benefits to the poor and lower income people are truly understood, Huckabee may wind up winning it all.

    Clay Willis

    January 8, 2008 at 1:25 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: